Architecture Evaluation Utilizing CBAM and AHP 


Vol. 13,  No. 5, pp. 683-690, Oct.  2006
10.3745/KIPSTD.2006.13.5.683


PDF
  Abstract

The CBAM (Cost Benefit Analysis Method) provides a method for deciding the best architectural strategy by considering cost, schedule, and risks as well as the benefits of the architectural strategy. But many parts of the CBAM do not present quantitative evidence explicitly on whether it is the best architectural strategy among others because it depends on the stakeholders’ consensus, vote, and/or intuition. In this study, we apply the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) to CBAM to provide explicit quantitative evidence and to reduce the possibility of subjective decision-making errors that may occur in the CBAM.

  Statistics
  Cite this article

[IEEE Style]

J. H. Lee, S. W. Kang, J. H. Cho, J. S. Kim, "Architecture Evaluation Utilizing CBAM and AHP," The KIPS Transactions:PartD, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 683-690, 2006. DOI: 10.3745/KIPSTD.2006.13.5.683.

[ACM Style]

Ji Hyun Lee, Sung Won Kang, Jin Hee Cho, and Jin Sam Kim. 2006. Architecture Evaluation Utilizing CBAM and AHP. The KIPS Transactions:PartD, 13, 5, (2006), 683-690. DOI: 10.3745/KIPSTD.2006.13.5.683.

Forms

Search
(IN TITLE, AUTHOR, ABSTRACT,KEYWORDS)

Advanced Search ▼

POPULAR KEYWORDS
(TOP 10 KEYWORDS)

Recent Publications
(LAST 3 YEARS)

Old Journals

Indexing

All publications of TKIPS is indexed in DOI, EBSCO, Google Scholar, Crossref, and CrossCheck.

TKIPS is also selected as the Journal for Accreditation by NRF (National Research Foundation of Korea).

Related Journals